Showing posts with label Kaleidoscope. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kaleidoscope. Show all posts

Saturday 31 October 2020

Kaleidoscope #5 | July 2020

 

Kaleidoscope: Issue 5, dated July 2020

SINGAPORE


2020 General Election (GE2020)


The general election is a form of a parliamentary election, where all incumbent members of the parliament (MPs) are dissolved and an opportunity arises for all able men and women to become election candidates to compete over their position in parliament. Usually, most of the dominating party (the People’s Action Party) will still remain, so in order to ensure a good level of representativeness of Singaporeans, there are other positions such as non-candidate MPs (NCMPs) and nominated MPs (NMPs) to bring in different people who will introduce fresh perspectives to the conversations surrounding the governance of the country.


First, the results:


Of interest is the process of the election this year, not the results. This year’s general election is a breath of fresh air for a few reasons:

New norms for voting - time bands, self-inking pens and more eco-friendly booths

Since 2019, the Elections Department has pushed for changes to make the voting experience better for everyone. These included polling booths made of recyclable materials like cardboard (though it is still a prototype), self-inking pens (basically a stamp which is more elderly-friendly than normal pens), and more electronic documents such as online forms for nomination of candidates as well as electronic voting slips.

Thanks to the pandemic, more safety measures have to be in place. Recommended time bands are given in the voting slips mailed to those eligible for voting to avoid crowding at polling sites (since most people are still told to stay at home then). However, this could not stop long queues from forming due to safe distancing measures. Many voters complained of how inefficient the whole process was, and some were told to go home and come back later due to the long queues.The voting time was even extended from 8 PM to 10 PM at the last minute, causing a lot of dissatisfaction among voters and the opposition parties.

Campaigning goes digital

Due to the pandemic (again), most of the campaigning have to be brought online. Still, the human factor and the intimacy that can only be realised in face-to-face meetings are still extremely crucial. As a result, we see political candidates engaging with people in the heartlands - doing home visits and making their rounds in hawker centres and wet markets.

The digital space had brought in more engagement and conversations during the campaigning period. There were even memes surrounding candidates who stood out, such as Jamus Lim, who was the sensation online after his performance at the televised debates. Such conversations showed that Singaporeans are actively involved in politics, and are open to discussing their opinions online.

However, digital elections can have a lot of risks too, as evidenced by the 2016 US Presidential Elections, which revealed signs of intervention from other countries through hacking of emails plus the creation of widely-circulated misinformation and fake news online. We cannot even trust videos anymore because of deep fakes, where artificial intelligence can create convincing scenes of any person speaking without it actually happening.

More women running for candidacy

39 of the candidates are women, which is the highest number of female candidates in any general election. After the elections, more than 20 of them will enter parliament, making up nearly one third of elected seats, which is a major improvement from the past few election cycles.

Female representation in the parliament is important. According to an article by Channel NewsAsia:

“There was a conscious choice to include more women candidates in this term of Parliament as women bring important issues to the table and also offer different perspectives,” said Ms Sun Xueling, the Punggol West SMC MP-elect and the Senior Parliamentary Secretary for Home Affairs and National Development.

The same article gives a good example of how female MPs usually bring up issues like caregiving that are unrelated to economic development, and pushes for more urgency in developing policies that seek to address such issues.

“Female politicians are known to be more inclined towards engaging on topics outside the traditional bread-and-butter concerns like the economy, said Ms Nydia Ngiow, a senior director at public policy consultancy BowerGroupAsia.

Citing the example of MacPherson MP-elect Tin Pei Ling, Ms Ngiow said that the parliamentarian has championed issues that were not widely discussed such as mental health and difficulties facing single parents.

Her work appears to have paid off. This election, Ms Tin won 71.7 percent of the votes in her constituency - more than she garnered in 2015, and putting her among the candidates that won with the highest election margins this year. “

Opposition parties now have more influence and powers

Workers’ Party (WP) chief Pritam Singh has been appointed by the Prime Minister as the Leader of the Opposition. This will give him more staff support and resources to carry out his duties. With such a decision, Singapore will be able to move away from a one-party state and see more balance in policy-making, as well as increased competition in the local political scene, which brings out the best in future batches of MPs. Although the concept of opposition leader has been emerging since the last few GEs, with opposition parties trying to band together in their face-off against the PAP, having it as an official position is a first for Singapore.

This is slightly off-topic, but there has been a coalition that opposition parties have been striving for in 2018, which did not go very well. It was inspired by the elections of other countries such as Malaysia and those in the West, which saw opposition parties reign over their countries. Read more here.

So what can Mr Singh look forward to?

Privileges:

  • His speaking time will be doubled from 20 minutes to 40 minutes, which is on par with office holders.

  • An office in Parliament, staff support and resources, as well as additional allowance.

  • He will generally be given the right of first response among MPs to ask the lead question of ministers on policies, Bills and motions in Parliament. This will be at the discretion of the Speaker and subject to existing speaking conventions.

Duties:

  • Leading and organising the opposition’s parliamentary business.

  • Possibly: attending official state functions and taking part in visits and meetings with members of the Government and the public service.

  • Occasionally: receive briefings by the Government on confidential issues, and the matters to be briefed will be determined by the Government

These duties and privileges are based on the conventions and practices of other Westminster-style parliamentary systems, but reflects adaptations to Singapore's political and parliamentary context.

Personally, I find it quite heartening to see the members of the opposition working hand-in-hand with the ruling party to improve how Singapore is governed. I can only hope that as Singapore is able to establish an identity for herself, her political structure will evolve to be more mature and empower talented, caring people to influence decisions that will shape the society of the future. Perhaps, it can even become more robust and innovative, with parts that are uniquely Singaporean, just like our financial system.

National Day SG Together Pack


With the cancellation of plans that involves hosting this year’s celebrations at The Float @ Marina Bay, the original fun pack was repurposed into the SG Together Pack, which would be available for collection by every Singaporean and PR household starting from 20 July 2020, Monday.


I was involved in the packing of this too! More details can be found in upcoming posts of the “My Year 2020” series (will be linked there when the post is out).

The pack has received much attention in its conception stages - but for the wrong reasons.

The opt-out petitioning

The question that everyone wants to know about was, “Do we really need that pack of things as a physical token to commemorate this year’s National Day?”

A lot of Singaporeans believed that the resources poured into the making of these packs could be put into better use, amidst the pandemic crisis. Hence, there was a petition directed at the organising committee to allow Singaporeans to opt-out from this initiative.


https://www.change.org/p/ndp-2020-opt-out-from-receiving-ndp-2020-funpack

Yes, their voices were heard, and as Defence Minister Dr Ng Eng Hen mentioned in his parliamentary address, the production will be scaled down to cover only 80% of households, as compared to around 90% to 95% in previous years. In addition, uncollected funpacks will be donated to homes and institutions who would like to have it.

However, the Minister raised a good point about the need to have these packs. Prudence is necessary, especially when the nation’s finances have been stretched. But it cannot be at the expense of overcoming the mood of despondency that has caused us to be further apart from one another. As with the unwavering, and if I may, defiant spirit that Singaporeans have shown ever since the inaugural National Day Parade in 1966, the unity and collective confidence for the future that it engendered among Singaporeans was priceless.

That brings me to the significance of the SG Together pack this year.

Significance of the pack

As I was involved in the packing of the pack this year, I could tell that it was designed with Singaporeans in mind.

Let us start with the bag. The visual design of the bag was done by students who were mostly at Primary School level. No wonder these innocent-looking designs spark joy in me. What is more impressive is that pupils with disabilities also contributed to the designs. I was told that some of the drawings were done by the visually impaired students. What a powerful message for those feeling depressed under the bleak days of COVID-19! To learn more about the different types of designs, click here: https://www.nylon.com.sg/2020/07/ndp-2020-singapore-together-pack-whats-inside-and-where-to-get-yours/ 

The bag is environmentally friendly too. The cloth is quite durable and my parents like to reuse it as a recyclable bag when they shop for groceries. The bag itself may look a little flimsy, but it has a velcro at the top to help close the bag, which neatly makes up for the flimsy appearance by ensuring nothing in the bag accidentally spills out.

Moving on to the items in the bag. There were very practical things like a thermometer and quite a number of face masks inside. There were also a lot of Singapore flags and symbols included in the items for us to feel that we are a part of the nation. I bet they look lovely in photos and videos. The snacks were quite healthy (biscuits, chips or energy bars, depending on what you get) and the drinks were replaced with cans of chrysanthemum drink. I loved this change because it would be a great help to those who would want to binge-eat during this stressful period and lacked awareness of healthier alternatives to the usual snacks, plus the aluminium cans for the drinks are one of the most recyclable materials out there, satisfying environmental advocacy groups who wished for a reduction in single-use plastics in the pack.

Although there were not many things in the pack, it was a physical touchpoint from the organising committee to all Singaporeans, and symbolised a whole-of-nation effort to celebrate how far our country has come despite all the challenges that were in the way. In this sense, the pack was an uplifting gift that would hopefully bring smiles for all Singaporeans.

WORLD

NASA Mars Rover Launch


As you and I may get tired from reading through all these lines and lines of text, here is a quick video to bring us up to date on what this Mars Rover is all about:




NASA’s Perseverance rover, the fourth of its kind to be launched to the red planet, has taken off in July 2020. It is expected to land on Mars by February 2021.


What will the rover bring us?


In short, it will bring back soil and rock samples from Mars. What is this for? 


According to NASA, a drill on the rover will collect core samples of promising Martian rocks and soil, then will deposit them in a "cache“ (inside very clean tubes to avoid potential contamination from Earth’s microbes) on the planet's surface. A potential future robotic mission could pick them up and ferry them to Earth for analysis in laboratories by equipment too large or bulky to go to Mars. Perseverance will also help us learn more and test technologies that could benefit future human expeditions to Mars. For instance, it brought along Ingenuity, a robotic flying machine, which will be doing test flights on Mars. This will pave the way for similar machines to be used to aid rovers, landers and even humans in future exploration missions.


DISAMBIGUATION: landers vs rovers


Landers are spacecraft that are designed to land on the surfaces of another planet and last long enough to telemeter data back on Earth.


Rovers are vehicles that are activated upon reaching another planet. On their way there, they will be part of the payload in spacecraft. 


One special thing about rovers that aim to land on Mars is that they need some way to decelerate when they enter Mars’ atmosphere to avoid itself from being fried alive by the heat generated from the air resistance. Find out more about the excruciating details of landing on Mars here: https://mars.nasa.gov/mer/mission/timeline/edl/ 


Asides from landers and rovers, there are also many other types of spacecraft. Fortunately, NASA has helpfully provided definitions to classify spacecraft: https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/postsecondary/features/F_Spacecraft_Classification.html 

Why is such a mission important?

Under NASA's ongoing Mars Exploration Program, previous missions have helped us look for signs of habitable conditions in ancient times. The program's series of missions is helping us answer key questions about the potential for life on Mars.  Perseverance will take it one step further by searching for signs of past microbial life itself. This will be done through the search for biosignatures through studying the texture of the rock and soil samples, as well as the composition and distribution of organic molecules. Biosignatures are patterns of texture or substance that require life to form.

We can also look forward to a richer experience of Mars than we have now, as the rover is equipped with microphones that allow us to hear the sounds on Mars, and it will have many high-end tools to research more into the various questions of scientific interest on Mars.

As this is the closest to finding definitive proof of life on Mars, we will finally be able to answer the question of whether we are alone in this universe. There are countless planets out there who have habitable landscapes that are suited for life, but only Earth is currently inhabited by living creatures. If there is life on Mars, everything we know about the origins of life on Earth could change.

Other missions bound for Mars 

July has been a pretty busy period for Mars exploration. I did not plan to include the other missions in this post, but since the Seeker videos have touched on them, I will give them a quick look.

Other than NASA, Japan’s very own space agency, JAXA, has sent its spacecraft to land on Phobos, one of the two moons that orbit Mars. This will finally unravel the mystery behind the origins of Mars’ moons.

For the red planet itself, China and the United Arab Emirates have also launched their spacecraft toward there. The main highlight for China’s mission was that it was the first to send off a rover, lander and orbiter to Mars all in one go. While for the UAE, the star is its objective to better understand Mars’ atmosphere and geology by recording them for a few Martian years.

Find out more through these videos:

Japan: Martian Moons eXploration (MMX)

China: Tianwen-1 probe

UAE: Hope Probe








California’s Wildfires

California has been battling wildfires for some time now, and in the months to come, the fires would only get worse. This natural disaster is unprecedented in scale and complexity, so understanding such incidents will help us to be much better prepared for future waves.

Epic and record-breaking

The fire has been raging, burning millions and millions of acres. In October, months after this issue of the Kaleidoscope is supposed to have been published, the fires have now burned more than 4 million acres, a record for the most acres burned in a single year. The figure, which equals an area larger than Connecticut, is more than twice the acreage burned in the state’s previous record-worst fire season, in 2018.

In addition, due in part to human-caused warming and a drying climate, California recorded its first “gigafire” since modern records began in the early 1930s. The August Complex, a group of fires burning in and around the Mendocino National Forest, has torched more than 1 million acres and counting. 

Effects of the fires

Loss of land, lives and properties, toxic air, the sky turning red… All these descriptions are measly in compared to the visual impact images from the fires have given us.

Here is a video that gives a comprehensive coverage of the wildfire situation:



Causes of the fires

Such devastation begs the question of how these fires came about in the first place. The New York Times gave a detailed overview of the 4 main factors that have contributed to the fires, and over here, I will be expressing them in simple English:

  1. Climate change - global warming causes vegetation and basically anything that can serve as fuel to be burnt up to be drier. Drier things catch fire from a spark more easily. That spark could come from lightning or humans setting fire, intentionally or unintentionally.

  2. People - downed power lines, the vehicles’ rim scraping against the road surface and fireworks have all been contributing to the sparks that are needed to set vegetation and other objects ablaze. More people have chosen to live in areas that are near to forests (term for it is “urban-wildlife interface”), increasing the likelihood that some accident might cause the vegetation to blow up in flames.

  3. Fire suppression - in the history of firefighting in the US, much of the vegetation avoided being burnt away, but that led to an accumulation for more vegetation that fed materials to keep the fires going. As such, now controlled fires are taking place to get rid of unneeded material that will contribute to the spread of fires.

  4. Strong winds (Santa Ana winds) - each fall, strong gusts known as the Santa Ana winds bring dry air from the Great Basin area of the West into Southern California. These winds drive the second fire season which is thought to be from October to April. As these winds bring fires to urban, built-up areas, the economic losses in this season tend to be more severe.

 

Saturday 15 August 2020

Kaleidoscope #4 | June Edition


This issue of Kaleidoscope is going to get more personal. There will be more talk of my personal experiences online, but I will still touch on some current affairs.

As the post may be long. Here is a content page to help you find your way through all the good stuff:

Virtual travel


The coronavirus pandemic has made it harder to be out and about for people worldwide. Increasingly, virtual travels, which simulate the travel experience on a virtual space, is becoming a popular option on the Internet. According to an article by the August issue of Straits Times Asia Insider, many tour operators are developing virtual travel tours, with engaging tour guides bringing visitors on the Internet to explore different places around the world (usually through live streams), and using images and videos to replace the experience of actually being there.

Using digital tools as part of the tourism is not entirely novel. It has been a mainstay in popular tourist attractions in countries such as China to enhance the experience. When I visited Xi'an during an immersion trip a few years ago, I was surprised to see a large number of QR codes prominently displayed at museum exhibits and park signboards. These QR codes offer access to multimedia content, from audio guides and pictures to additional information and insights on the place. By adding a digital element to the traditional tourism experience, travel becomes more enriching. Moreover, the digital functions also made it easier for tourists to share their experiences on social media, potentially attracting their friends to visit the places featured on their social media posts.

不会用手机的博物馆,不是好博物馆_中证网
QR codes seen in Chinese museum exhibits. Image from Google Images.

However, with physical travel being out of the question, going completely virtual for travelling is now the way to go. I have jumped on the bandwagon too, and used a somewhat less conventional way of travelling - Google Earth. It has a "Voyager" feature that takes you to popular tourist spots worldwide. I picked Tokyo as my destination as I heard much about it from watching anime and I really wanted to know some of the scenic places as well as the history of the places there. I also searched up the featured attractions on YouTube to enhance my travelling experience, so that it feels like there are tourist guides bringing me through the various locations.

Here is what the Voyager function looks like in Google Earth. I chose the 48 Hours in Tokyo tour.


This is what it looks like inside. The unique thing about Voyager is that it offers a 3D map of the place to give you a bird's eye view. Then it has a picture and a succinct description of the place. Most of the things in the map are computer generated imagery, so it does not look like the real thing, but it is close enough to give you a feel of what the place looks like.

For a more immersive experience, I tried out the street views and photo spheres in the map. They are not too bad - you can do some quick cherry blossom viewing even when it is not the right season for it. I only regret that the images are of a low resolution.

It is easy to grow bored of hopping around static images of places, so I had some videos to keep me entertained and educated. One of the videos I watched looked like this:


So, unless you know the good street view spots, it is not easy to feel good from a virtual experience. But at the very least, virtual tours can still be useful if you just want a quick escape from wherever you are right now and gain some satisfaction from feeling smarter after learning more about new places and cultures.

If these sounds like too much work, there are always free, ready-made guided tours online, such as this one which uses Google Street View:


Virtual travel experiences have challenged the way we interact with the world, and encouraged us to reflect upon why we travel. Is it for the novelty? To satisfy one's curiosity about a foreign place and culture? Or to search for one's own answers to the meaning of life and the human experience? Everyone has different reasons to travel, but I am sure what makes travelling so appealing is the innate curiosity humans have to find out more about the unknown, and using all their senses to experience what it is being like in a foreign land to satisfy whatever they are searching for.

There is another form of virtual travel asides from live streams, online researching and street view. Documentaries. I explored the rich culture and history of the Democratic Republic of Congo through a BBC Documentary. It presents a sad story of how the people have suffered under the reign of corrupt, exploitative rulers, whose greed and misgovernance have made the painful history filled with violence, poverty and discrimination repeat itself again and again.


A good watch: some elevator-themed mini-documentary to uplift your spirits!



As a person who is passionate about the subject of Geography, I find that this video provides us a refreshing perspective on how we look at cities and societies in general. Elevators have been and evolved with us for a long time. The current coronavirus crisis has forced us to relook at the way we interact with elevators. I have gained a few insights from this video:

First, smart technologies. I have experienced this first hand while I go to the ministry buildings in Singapore for studies, internships and interviews. You indicate the floor you want to go and go to the corresponding lift that will take you there. From what it looks like, it seemed that there was an algorithm that optimises the load between the elevators and distribute people with different destinations in mind as evenly as possible to reduce waiting time and overcrowded lobbies. This will become more important in the midst of the pandemic, where safe distancing has become necessary.

Second, high-rise cities. Without the invention of elevators, building structures that go beyond six, seven storeys high will become more and more unfeasible, since it would be tiring for most people to scale many flights of stairs just to get to the storey they want. Elevators also made it possible for elderly, people with disabilities, and large groups of people (like families) to be able to access their homes if they reside in high-rise buildings. Elevators literally defined how modern cities look today, by making it possible for architecture to go higher. Not to mention how the high-rise buildings they made possible gave rise to a new kinds of sport - vertical marathons.

Third, vulnerable groups such as the disabled and low-income people. These people are more affected by the coronavirus crisis since they do not have access to functioning, safe elevators. It will be harder for them to maintain safe distancing since the elevators they use are more likely to break down, in addition to sharing poorly ventilated places of residence, yet they are the ones who cannot afford the technology to work at home, and will have to go out at work. As such, it is more difficult for them to contribute in stopping the spread of Covid-19.

The plastic crisis and a sustainable future for our world


The plastic problem is one that exists on many different levels. From its production, to its use and then its disposal by Singaporeans and many others worldwide, people are just becoming too wasteful.

First, let us focus on what we can relate to most - plastic use.

According to a study  led by six alumni students from the National University of Singapore’s Master of Science (Environmental Management) programme in May 2020, Singapore households generated an additional 1334 tonnes of plastic waste during the two-month Circuit Breaker period, where nearly everyone had to stay at home.

This comes with a rise in food takeaways and delivery of goods for online shopping, where plastic packaging is inevitable. The plastic situation had become so out of hand that there are long queues of people outside of plastic distributors, waiting to get their hands on more plastic packaging materials.

Asides from takeaways and groceries, plastics have found themselves in many other applications:
  • Shields and barriers in taxis and hawker centres
  • Face masks and face shields
  • Laboratory equipment
  • Storage of medication, medical waste, samples, etc.
  • The list goes on...
This plastic frenzy has been exacerbated by unvalidated concerns over health and safety, with food and beverage outlets imposing temporary bans on reusable containers to prevent cross contamination. However, medical experts have since clarified that such concerns are unfounded as well-washed reusables are safe when the coronavirus can be killed with regular dish soap and sanitisation.

On the other hand, concerns on reusable materials are much more serious when it comes to the clinical context. Many medical professionals rely on disposable plastics to maintain a high standard of hygiene and safety when it comes to handling biohazards and medication, since this is a matter of life and death.

The consequences of so much plastic waste is detrimental - our only landfill, Semakau Landfill, gets filled up faster, and we will soon see that our trash has nowhere to go. Even countries like China and Indonesia are refusing to take in waste imports for sorting and recycling.

To sum up what has been said so far, Singaporeans consume a lot, demand a lot of disposables and generate a lot of waste. Retailers have also worsened this problem by unfounded fears.

Now, before anyone reading this starts to crack from the guilt and horror from the shocking statistics, let me step back from consumers for the time being and go on to explain the second part of the problem which we consumers have no control of - oil.

One important fact to bear in mind is that plastic does not only come from crude oil. Plastic is made from natural, organic raw materials such as plants, coal, natural gas and crude oil. However, we see so much of our plastics made from crude oil because it is cheap.

Crude oil has been an extremely lucrative business, so when a deal to cut oil production between the largest oil producers in the world, such as Russia and Saudi Arabia, expired this year, they launched a price war in a bid to gain market share. In other words, these producers want to have a bigger share of the pie, so that their crude oil exports can give them more profits.

As such, oil prices had plunged more than 50% for the past few months, dramatically lowering the cost of producing plastics from crude oil. It is only natural that plastic distributors will want to buy these low-cost plastics, and not the more expensive alternative - recycled plastics. Otherwise, they would not be able to sustain themselves financially during the pandemic.

We cannot help it that so much plastic is produced and we often find ourselves in need of it, but the third and final issue of our plastic problem is something that we definitely can do something about - where our plastic waste goes.

There is much talk about Singapore going zero-waste, but that goal could be unreachable if we do not buck up in our recycling. Plastic recycling is, well, dismal, at about 4% according to the latest statistics.

Why are so much plastics not recycled?
  1. Entire batches of them had to be discarded away once they were contaminated by food and liquid waste.
  2. Not all plastics can be recycled in Singapore's context. Polyvinyl chlorides (No. 3) and polystyrene (No. 6) cannot be recycled here. Biodegradable bags cannot be recycled too! Although their chemical composition is meant for them to decompose in landfill environments, they go straight to the incinerator in Singapore.
    Image found from orgayana.com
  3. Not all types of plastics have the same value. Higher value plastics, which are No. 1 (PET - polyethylene terephthalate), 2 (HDPE - high density polyethylene) and 5 (PP - polypropylene) are more likely to be recycled as they are more profitable. For the low density polyethylene (LDPE - no. 4), they are soft to the touch and are low in value. As such, recycling companies will incur costs if they recycle LDPE.
  4. Also, coloured plastics usually have a lower market value as they cannot be dyed flexibly and are not often recycled since they are harder to identify with automatic sorting machines.
  5. The most unfortunate fact of all - most plastics can only be recycled once or twice. More than that, they get downcycled and cannot be used again anymore. This is unlike aluminium, which can be recycled indefinitely.
Underlying all these problems are the cost of plastic recycling, technical limitations, widespread ignorance of what are considered recyclables by the local population and severe limitations in where our trash could go, now that countries are refusing to take in our waste.

If the statistics and technicalities are too confusing, here is a video that illustrates how plastics get recycled in Singapore:


What can we do for a better future? Here are some of my ideas:
  • Do away with the ignorance!
    • Spread awareness of container lending programmes, to maximise the use of reusable containers. Or even better, bring your own reusable container whenever you want to get a takeaway!
    • Follow social media accounts and personalities who are very knowledgeable about recycling, and level up your recycling skills on the way! This is important because there are actually a lot of products like snack wrappers and masks that are made from composite materials (plastic combined with a lot of other things like rubber, paper, aluminium, etc), and they cannot be recycled locally as we lack the technology for this.
  • Businesses and government policies can consider imposing on a plastic tax to better reflect the environmental costs of plastic use, while giving rebates / reusable containers and bags to lower income groups for them to still be able to get their daily essentials.
  • Or, they can invest more in recycling research so that we can overcome all these technical and cost limitations that is stopping us from becoming a zero-waste nation.
  • Delivery options can change too. 
    • There are already suggestions calling for delivery companies to make no cutlery and no straw as the default option for deliveries. This is important because disposable cutlery like these cannot be recycled.
    • Since large group of people like families and companies are ordering so much online, maybe online retailers can allow them to order in bulk and group orders of the same kind into a single packaging. We can save on packaging costs and it is more convenient this way, as long as consumers feedback to them about wanting their deliveries to be done this way.
  • Instead of ordering so many deliveries, we can explore other ways of getting food. I think during the pandemic where it is harder for people to go outside of their homes, vending machines can be a safe and convenient way of getting food and drinks.
  • A more direct way to reduce the need for plastic is to pick up cooking as a skill and learn to make our own food. It is a rewarding experience, perfect for curing boredom, and is beneficial for our stomachs and the environment!
  • Create your very own waste management strategy. Using what you have learnt and research online, see what needs to be reduced, reused and recycled. Make it a habit to find out more about what the things you use are made up of, and plan how to dispose of them accordingly when you are done with it. Personally, I feel that reducing our consumption is the best way to protect our environment, but we also need many more people to start reusing and recycling things in order to reduce the waste we generate and incinerate.
Finally, what I think is the most important in fighting the surge in plastic waste, along with a whole range of environmental problems, is cultivating a respect for our things and the environment in general . This respect can be about valuing our possessions, which go through so many stages of making, processing and transporting to get to our homes, only to serve us. Each possession we have takes a lot of effort, time and ingenuity to be produced. Yet, when we find no use for them, we discard them unthinkingly. And many people (including myself at times) have the cheek to make excuses of ignorance and inconvenience when it comes to sorting waste and recycling them. Ensuring that our waste are treated responsibly instead of letting them endanger natural environments is the least we can do in return for how much our possessions have done to make our lives better before they become waste.

We need to cultivate a culture where we treat our environment and things with more care and respect. There are already legends and folklores that celebrate that and inculcate such values to young children. One example that I know of are a group of monsters called tsukumogami, which came from a belief that gods and spirits reside in everything of this world, including the objects that we use.

Friday 31 July 2020

Life Challenges #3: Bookworm Challenge | Part 1: Challenge Rules



Works of the written or spoken word are unidirectional time machines, mind readers and windows to imaginary worlds. There are countless ideas we can gain and apply to our daily lives by interacting with the people of the past through words in various mediums. These mediums can be books, newspapers, journals, magazines, documentaries and many more. Going through any of the words left by people who have walked down the paths of their choice can be immensely meaningful. They allow us to understand how we come to be, and where we will be heading.

It is in such a magical world that the third in my series of Life Challenges will be founded on. This challenge is called the Bookworm Challenge, and this post is about its rules.

1. The challenge is to happen over a duration of 4 weeks, from 1 August 2020 to 30 August 2020. If you are wondering why the math involving the 28 days (4 weeks) does not add up, it is because 2 more days are added at the end (29 and 30 August 2020) as a contingency plan against any incomplete tasks.

2. A daily reading routine lasting 15 minutes will be implemented. What is to be done in this duration is up to me.

3. I am to finish reading a book during the challenge duration. For now, I am planning to read a Chinese book. It is a translated version of the biography of Elon Musk, "Silicon Valley Iron Man".

4. I am also to catch up with the news for at least two days per week. The news is an important source of information on current affairs which will be helpful in drafting future Kaleidoscope posts and help me understand more of what I am reading. I have freedom in choosing what kind of news to read and the method of consumption. It can be videos, online articles or infographics. As long as I learn of something, anything is good.

5. Finally, I will submit at least one reading note every fortnight. Submissions will appear on the Vincent Academy website. This component is expected to be the hardest as it requires the most commitment. However, I believe this can be done with consistent effort in trying to read.

I hope to be able to cultivate the good habit of reading widely through this challenge. This can also help me improve on my vocabulary and knowledge which is necessary for writing better blog posts. In addition, the various writing styles I get exposed to through reading can help me to come up with higher quality work for future Story Creation Challenges!

Saturday 30 May 2020

Kaleidoscope #3 | May Stories (Part 3)


#3: May Stories (Part 3)

Recently, on my social media feed, I have been seeing more opinions surrounding Singapore's responses to Covid-19 and how Covid-19 has impacted to our lives. Looks like the virus is still pretty viral in our social media platforms. 

As much as I want to quickly drop the topic of the coronavirus, it still serves as the context for most of our discussions and lives nowadays, so I will inevitably still be touching on it. Gone were the days of Donald Trump dominating the news headlines when the whole world has a crisis to tackle. But the coronavirus which replaced him in the position for the hottest news was not much better.

So on with the stories that I read up recently...

Commentaries by university professors on Singapore's responses to Covid-19

Within the last week, a very interesting discussion about the Singapore government's responses to the pandemic made by 2 local university professors had been shared and commented on by some of my friends who are studying / working in local universities. Even though the accuracy of the facts were very inconsistent (since errors with the statistics and political motivations coming into the picture), we could see that there were two distinct sides: whether someone disapproves or approves of the government's responses to the crisis.

I append the posts of these two gentlemen here:


I think it is very encouraging that academics are taking the lead to get everyone to reflect on what the government had done well in managing a crisis. I also learnt quite a bit on critique skills while reading on their posts and the comments.

After going through both of their opinions, I am more in agreement with the view that the government has managed the pandemic reasonably well. To show this, I will expand upon the two main issues that were covered by the writers: the decision to mask on, and the management of foreign workers.

With regards to the mask problem, the initial decision to not have the general population put on masks was out of concern for the sustainability of the stock of masks and the availability of information on Covid-19. It was easy to see that there would be a shortage in the global supply of masks, and Singapore did not have the resources nor the equipment to be able to produce masks independently, since there was not much demand for it before Covid-19 became a pandemic for this to be feasible economically. Singapore is in a tight spot because the external sector it relies on to drive most of her economic growth is falling apart, and Singapore will also need to control her spending in order to rebuild her own economy for the post-pandemic world. Until then, masks did not seem very high up on the priority list. The lack of information on the coronavirus also meant that many were ignorant of asymptomatic cases and how easily transmissible the virus was. As such, it would only make sense that the masks were reserved for healthcare workers and those who were sick and really needed it.

To be fair, the government did communicate the mask issue to the masses eventually, and ramped up on production. And amidst this crisis, it would be difficult to come clean entirely about the masks because any irresponsible proclamations made about it could cause undue alarm and influence the willingness of suppliers to produce the masks for us. With all these people-management at play and limited resources, the government would be forced to prioritise its efforts in order to contain the spread of Covid-19. In this case, it meant missing out a few months of not wearing masks and focus its efforts on quarantining existing patients of the virus, most of whom came from overseas.

More fundamentally than the mask issue, the government did well in communicating its plans with the people and is as transparent as it could possibly be. This excellent communication was lauded by the international community. But we err, for we are all human, and the same goes for governments. In February, when the DORSCON level was raised to orange, many Singaporeans mistook it as some sort of alarm for the virus or something indicative of a lock-down and went on panic buying. Internationally, this incident made a dent on Singapore's generally positive image. Also, this brought out the larger problem of gaps in communication and mental care. Singapore emerged out of that incident stronger. The various communication platforms rolled out, infomercials to spread awareness of Covid-19, responsible coverage by the media to help people make sense and cope with the information and people generally being more helpful toward one another, showed that Singaporeans, along with their government, had the capacity to bounce back from failures and learn from their mistakes. As such, we cannot demean the government's efforts to deal with the pandemic just because of a few failures.

To me, the issue here is not about how transparent any organisation is, but how maturely and intelligently the masses could handle the information regarding the pandemic. In a crisis response, information is extremely valuable, but making a lot of information accessible to everyone at once may not necessarily help in the response as information is not always translated to constructive action.

Next, moving on to the responses to the pandemic involving foreign workers. How Singapore handles foreign workers in dealing with the coronavirus crisis was generally seen as a weakness in the country's overall response framework to the pandemic.

I think Professor Ben Leong's analysis of the root cause of the large number of Covid-19 cases in foreign workers is quite cogent. According to him, Singapore's limited testing capacity is to blame. And this is true. Many cases, especially asymptomatic ones, have not been uncovered in time due to the lack of testing kits in Singapore. Meanwhile, other countries who have undergone massive testing, such as South Korea, had yielded results in containing the virus.

Some people might be inclined to blame the government and the reigning political party for the state the foreign workers were in now. Though I agree with views pertaining to more regulation, oversight and mutual support by the various stakeholders in terms of improving the workers' living conditions, it is unfair to criticise the government for neglecting foreign workers because of any kind of selfish reason. Managing foreign workers is no easy feat, especially when one-fifth of Singapore's population are made up of them. Much of the management was delegated to their employers, who unfortunately have to worry much about the costs of accommodating them as they try to keep up with the standards. We are talking about livelihoods here. Many of them have jobs that could not be worked on at home, unlike most of the local population, and they do not have the means of providing for themselves.

In general, I find that much of the issues surrounding Singapore's responses to the coronavirus was mostly due to the lack of measures targeted at the asymptomatic disease carriers. A disease like this was unprecedented and we could not rely on the same playbook we used for previous pandemics. I think Singapore really shone in terms of its comprehensive and methodical measures to deal with the pandemic, the outpouring of support and sharing of information between the government and the community, as well as the ability to rectify mistakes quickly. This is why I am proud of how Singapore handled the coronavirus crisis.

📌 Pinned

[Live] Raison d'être for "The Rumination" series, progress on blog posts

LATEST UPDATES:   (1)  12 Feb 2021  -  New post under  "Dear Diary of Year 2020"  published!  (2)  7 Mar 2021  -  New post under  ...